【Defendant A】 As to the crimes of 2018 order 1775 order order and 2018 order 2487 order order and 2018 order 3362 order order.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Incheon District Court on July 14, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 18, 201. On December 3, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents, etc. at the Manpo branch of the Gwangju District Court on March 28, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 28, 2013. On August 14, 2013, the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 2, 2013, and the execution of the sentence became final and conclusive on January 24, 2018.

Defendant

B On August 26, 2010, the Daejeon District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution to be imposed on September 3, 2010, which became final and conclusive on September 3, 2010. On September 20, 2017, the Daejeon District Court sentenced 6 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution to be imposed on September 28, 2017.

Defendant

C was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on May 19, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 8, 201, and on December 21, 2015, the Jeju District Court sentenced seven years of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic (Fraud) at the Jeju District Court on December 21, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2016.

[2] Defendant A, who had an intention or ability to take over a monitoring factory due to the lack of business funds at the end of the end of the year of 2007 or to establish a monitoring agency under the name of Victim G and Victim H, attempted to use the funds and credit cards after receiving them in the name of the victims by deceiving the victims as necessary for the establishment and operation of a monitoring agency.

Defendant

B, even though Defendant A was aware of the absence of business funds, Defendant A prepared a false employed document in the name of the victims to receive a loan, and attempted to receive a credit card in the name of the victims, and conspired to receive a payment from Defendant A.

1..