beta
Text
[Defendant A] Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two months.
Defendant
A 6 million won shall be additionally collected.
3.2
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] Defendant B was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment at the Seoul Central District Court on March 25, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 15, 2015.
Defendant
on November 7, 2013, K was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court for fraud, and the above judgment was finalized on the 15th of the same month. On February 4, 2016, K was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Seoul East District Court for embezzlement and became final and conclusive on the 12th of the same month.
[2] Criminal facts: (a) Defendant A and B’s fraud committed by Defendant A and B, along with the network P, with Defendant A and B, committed as if there were a large amount of non-financial accounts with the P, thereby attempting to take money from the victim Qa and other R such as the victim Qa.
Defendant
B In that of T coffee in the vicinity of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on June 19, 2012, B, along with the net P, would provide for the victims with KRW 150 million (3 billion) in a loan of KRW 3 billion from the SP’s non-funds account.
Defendant A, through a telephone conversation with the victims at that time, will pay the amount of money promised on the face of the head of the PP passbook with a more time to get the head of the Tong.
“.....”
However, there was no P's non-financial passbook, and even if Defendant A and B borrowed money from victims under the pretext of recognition, they did not have an intention or ability to pay the principal, profits, etc. according to the promise.
Defendant
A and B received the check from the victims, i.e., KRW 10 million in front of them, and received KRW 20 million in total from the national bank account of Defendant B to the national bank account of Defendant B.
As a result, Defendant A and B were provided property by deceiving victims in collusion with the network P.
"2016 Highest 126" - The fraud of Defendant A and K