1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 20, 2012, the Plaintiff, a company established for the purpose of manufacturing motor vehicle parts, filed a report on the installation of wastewater discharge facilities with the Defendant on July 20, 2012, and filed a report on the alteration of wastewater discharge facilities following the extension of gold-processing facilities (agraving and cutting process) on December 5, 2014.

B. Gyeonggi-do, as a result of the control of the Plaintiff on December 17, 2014, notified the Defendant on March 6, 2015, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s wastewater discharge facilities (i) the smoke and escape water facilities, (ii) the fruit-generating equipment facilities, and (iii) the cuinc facilities, which are specific substances harmful to water quality, exceed 0.1mg/L, which are the standards for the application of specific substances harmful to water quality under the Enforcement Rules of the Water Quality and Aquatic Ecosystem Conservation Act, (i) the ma and escape facilities, (ii) the 467.5mg/L, (iii) the string facilities, (iv) the string facilities, and (v) the 82.9mg/L, which were discharged, were criminal cases by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s actual operator.

C. Meanwhile, on June 7, 2015, the Plaintiff and C received a summary order of each fine of KRW 5 million from this court under approximately KRW 2015 high-ranking7844 on the grounds of the above criminal facts, and around that time, the said summary order became final and conclusive.

Accordingly, on August 11, 2015, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to close the KY WY WY processing facilities, smoke and water dynasing facilities, excessive strings, and adynasing operations facilities for the purpose of installing and operating the wastewater discharge facilities without permission.

(A) The plaintiff is arguing only the legality of the order of closure concerning the over-the-counter typer among the order of closure of this case. (hereinafter the above over-the-counter typer "the machinery of this case" and the order of closure concerning over-the-counter typer "the disposition of this case"). / [Grounds for recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 1, 2, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff lawfully installed wastewater discharge facilities and reported the change thereof, and operated the machinery of this case accordingly, and the cooling water in the machinery of this case is circulated, and the said cooling water is run.