The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the defendant did not assault the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty is erroneous in erroneous determination of facts.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, the victim F from the police to the court below's judgment, around 09:20 on July 9, 2013, the victim F consistently stated that he committed an assault, such as the defendant who was a taxi engineer and the defendant's scambling due to air-conditioning problems, and scamblinging the defendant, and scambling the defendant. The defendant made a statement at the police station that "the victim's scam less than the victim's scambling on his hand," and the defendant made a statement corresponding to the facts charged. After the defendant reported 112, the other person reported the dispute between the defendant and the victim, and again reported 112, the victim's statement is credibility in the above statement. Thus, the fact that the defendant abused the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below is acknowledged.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.