A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months or more and ten days of detention.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On September 14, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and fifteen days of penal detention by obstructing business operations at the Changwon District Court on September 14, 2017 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Changwon Prison on October 7, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: “Around 06:00, at the front of the counter-month civil petition center located in 121 as of 3:15, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and 121” means that D, upon the Defendant’s request, was sent to the Defendant and recommended him to return home after having taken the Defendant to the above place, the police officer of the Minsan Police Station C of the Minsan Central Police Station, who was called out after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report, without any particular reason, “D will interfere with D’s discharge of his/her duty, i.e., D’s discharge of frienda, fritha, bron, b

“In doing so, the breath of “,” and assaulted D’s breath by using breaths, leading D about about 3 meters, leading D with approximately 3 meters, and intending to go beyond the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

2. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act was found to be the police station of Masan-gu, Changwon-si, Masan-si, 315, and 147, while under the influence of alcohol on October 16, 2017, and “C police box has been sent to the police station of Masan-gu, Masan-si, 315, and 147.” The Defendant was sent to the C police station of Masan-si, Mara, Mara, Mara, Mara, Mara, and Mara, Mara, Mara, and Mara, Mara, Mara, and Mara, Mara, Hadi, Hadi, who was found to have been found to have

We have been able to avoid a disturbance between about 50 minutes, such as lying on the floor, when she takes a bath with the large interest.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, D, and F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing internal investigation reports (topology photographs and CDs attached to the crimes taken byCCTV);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning a crime (a person who interferes with the performance of official duties and who is sentenced to imprisonment);