logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.15 2016나74509
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is owned by A and B B B between A and the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “small-type vehicle”).

As to the insurance period, the insurance period is set from February 17, 2016 to December 29, 2016, and ② CBluri vehicle (hereinafter “CBluri vehicle”) and the said two vehicles are collectively referred to as “instant vehicle.”

(2) The Defendant is a construction manager of a road at a point of 100 meters in Geum River-gu bank direction (hereinafter “the road” in this case) from the National Highway 29 line, which is located within a 100-meter radius from the National Highway 29 line, as a gold bank account of the Gunsan City.

B. At around 21:10 on May 15, 2016, D, while driving a blick vehicle and driving the instant road, D, while the road signs installed on the ground of the said road fall on the surface of the road, and accordingly, performed an accident where the parts of steel products, which were entirely scattered on the surface of the road, were dissipatedd, and all parts of the said vehicle, the parts of the body, the lick, and the 4 wheelchairs were entirely destroyed due to the parts of the said steel products.

(hereinafter referred to as “first accident”). (c)

A immediately after the first accident, after receiving contact with D, the above accident occurred, due to the above steel parts scattered around the first accident site in the vicinity of the road surface while driving the 21:40 on the same day of the same day by driving the flachil vehicle at around 21:40 on the opposite side of the road of this case and driving the flachil vehicle in the opposite side of the road of this case.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second accident”) and the first and second accidents together are referred to as “the instant accident” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”).

A on May 16, 2016, filed a claim with the Plaintiff for the payment of insurance money equivalent to the repair cost incurred due to the instant accident, and on June 1, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a claim with A for the payment of insurance money equivalent to the repair cost incurred due to the instant accident, and on June 1, 2016, the amount of KRW 1,49,000 in relation to the

arrow