A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On March 28, 2014, the Defendant appealed a judgment of a fine of ten million won, which was sentenced to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. at the Seoul Southern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Southern District Court”), but was sentenced to the dismissal of appeal. However, the Defendant filed another appeal, which was sentenced to the dismissal of appeal on September 22, 2014, and the said judgment of the first instance became final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a business owner operating the “Eanma treatment establishment” on the 5th floor of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building with visual impairment 1, and F and G are workers who provide guidance to the son who found the above business establishment.

No one shall assist an unspecified person to perform sexual intercourse or similar sexual intercourse in return for receiving or promising to receive money, valuables or other property benefits from such an unspecified person.

On April 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) from around 20:0 to April 20, 200:30 on April 24, 2014, 17 studio 10,000 won, including 9 studios equipped with shower facilities; and (b) from the male descendants of an unspecified person who reported the Internet advertisement, etc. through the above F and G, the Defendant received approximately KRW 50,000 won in return for sexual intercourse; (c) from the male descendants of an unspecified person who discovered the Internet advertisement, and (d) caused sexual traffic women, such as H, who were employed on the condition of paying KRW 60,00 among them, to have sexual intercourse with the guest; and (d) from January 1, 2014 to April 24, 2014, the Defendant had them receive KRW 120,000 won or KRW 150,000 from the male grandchildren, and had them do the sexual intercourse over 2815, including the above H.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with F and G to arrange commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against H, I, J, F, and G;

1. Each statement of K, etc.;

1. Records of seizure, list of seizure, business registration certificate, copy of books, document analysis No. 6 of investigation report, suspect interest calculation, lease contract.