logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.17 2016고단4800
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in the Dti-gu.

1. Around 18:26 December 14, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at the section of approximately 1.5 km from the front side of the 1009Haak apartment to the front side of the E from the 1.5km, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.26% of the blood alcohol concentration of the Defendant.

2. Around 18:26 December 14, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., after-accidents), driving the said vehicle and driving the front road of the lower middle school located within the ebbban-dong at the ebban-air apartment complex from the side of the eban-motor vehicle driving school to the nban-air apartment complex at an rapid speed.

At the time, at night and where an apartment complex is located, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front door and the left door and the left door and the left door in the vehicle driver.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant received the Defendant’s passenger protection pole installed in the front part of the passenger vehicle in front of the Defendant’s passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle in front of the Haan apartment complex 10 commercial complexes around 18:33 of the same day, and continued to proceed, the Defendant received the front part of the Haan apartment in front of the Haan apartment in front of the Haan apartment in front of the 18:41 of the same day, while continuing to proceed, the Defendant received the front part of the Haan apartment in front of the Haan apartment in front of the 309 Haan apartment in front of the 18:5 on the same day, and continued to proceed, received the front part of the Haan apartment in front of the Haan apartment in front of the Haan apartment in front of the 19:00 Haan apartment in front of the 19:00 Haan apartment in front of the 19.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing the above duties, which is a pedestrian protection pole owned by the victim’s luminous life. 874,290 won.

arrow