The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, who was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Daegu District Court on July 1, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 27, 201.

On March 16, 2012, at around 20:0, the Defendant provided D’s 0.03g of approximately 0.03 grams to D’s Mepurged vehicle, which was parked on the road near the Home Pungdong in Daegu Suwon-gu.

Accordingly, the Defendant received psychotropic drugs-related Mesacams.

2. The Defendant consistently asserts that there is no fact from the investigative agency to the investigation agency that there was no delivery of Mestopists to D.

There is a statement D as evidence that corresponds to the facts charged in this case.

The purpose of this, "D, after making a telephone conversation with the defendant who was in Ulsan on March 16, 2012, agreed to do so, and the defendant who was getting on a train in Ulsan, left his own car in the Dong zone and parked on the road side near the Home Puls located in Ulsan-dong, and the defendant left the train and returned from the vehicle. The defendant returned from the defendant who returned to the Dong zone at around 20:00 on the same day." Accordingly, the defendant claimed that "D moved D from the Dong zone to the adjacent area of the Puldong-dong Home Puls, and the defendant did not deliver D and he did not deliver D and he."

However, D’s above statements are as follows, i.e., the first police officer, stated that D was drinking in a restaurant located in the Dong-dong, Daegu-gu, Ma, the first police officer, and that F or the Defendant was administered by me at the wind of driving the Mestopian, but only the Defendant was the offender.