logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.07.03 2015구합1830
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on May 14, 2008 under the status of non-professional employment (E-9) (E-9), and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on March 8, 2013, which was five days before the expiration of the period of stay (E-9 March 13, 2013).

On February 28, 2014, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that there was no “probing-founded fears” (see Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 18, 2014, but was dismissed on December 16, 2014.

[Based on recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings of the instant disposition is legitimate. The plaintiff's assertion is punjb from the Simara (Sarago). On Nov. 1, 2011, when the plaintiff visited Pakistan, the plaintiff threatened the plaintiff "Imar from the Simar high village", and on Nov. 15, 201, three persons who called the plaintiff on the way that the plaintiff started to go at his house after going through his own session and go to go to this region." The plaintiff's refusal to go to the plaintiff, thereby threatening the plaintiff's left part and the plaintiff's chest.

On December 2013, 2013, Simpha calls to the Plaintiff’s family members and intimidation that “the Plaintiff will not leave the Plaintiff’s return to Pakistan.”

As such, even though there is a risk that the Plaintiff would be injured on the grounds of religion when he returns to Pakistan, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, and the instant disposition is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

Provided, That the board shall be set up in each entry of the evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4.

arrow