1. The amount of real estate listed in the separate sheet remaining after the cost of auction is deducted from the proceeds of auction;

In full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the whole arguments, the plaintiffs and the defendant shared the real estate as stated in the Disposition No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate of this case") according to each share of 1/4 and 1/2 of the plaintiffs, respectively. The plaintiffs and the defendant did not enter into an agreement prohibiting division of the real estate of this case and agreed on the method of division of the real estate of this case, but did not reach an agreement on the method of division.

In addition, the real estate of this case is an apartment with no clear distinction of living space inside, and it is not appropriate to divide it in kind.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 269(2) of the Civil Act, the real estate of this case shall be put to an auction and the remaining amount after deducting the auction cost shall be distributed according to the share ratio to the plaintiffs and the defendant.

The plaintiffs' claims are reasonable, and this decision is delivered with the decision of the court.