logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2018.11.22 2018고단334
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On November 2, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for interference with business in the Cheongju District Court’s Incheon District Court’s Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju detention center on May 29, 2018.

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 4, 2018, at around 21:50, the Defendant obscenity reported at the C cafeteria located in Dacheon-si B, and the police officers called to the site at the main place reported at around 112, to stop the pedago, and to check the pedago at the police station near the Defendant’s residence, and to take the pedago at the location where the Defendant’s residence and to request the Defendant to return home, “I am b and sing down. I am well? I am this, I am math’s mar. I am? I am? I am you am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. and sty sty sty, and do openly obscene act

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, and at the seat of the Dacheon Police Station D, the Defendant expressed that he would leave the Doctrine E with the Defendant’s her will to get out of the Defendant’s will, and, in order to restrain the Defendant, the Doctrine “Is the Doctrine, Is the Doctrine, Is the Doctrine, Is the Doctrine, Is the Doctrine, Is the Doctrine’s face, and put the Doctrine over the Defendant’s body by spreading the Doctrine, and by spreading it to the Defendant’s body.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Criminal history: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, data on the results of the search of prisoners, and Acts and subordinate statutes to report an investigation (verification of repeated crimes);

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obscenity, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Aggravation of repeated crimes;

arrow