logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.02.03 2016고단1816
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than six months and a fine not exceeding 300,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall unlawfully use a license plate of two-wheeled motor vehicle in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act and public marks and illegal use thereof;

Nevertheless, during the period of the end of August 2016, the Defendant removed the number plate of two-wheeled automobile attached to the Defendant’s C Y in the 108-dong Underground Parking Lots, which is owned by the Defendant, from the 108-dong Underground Parking Lots, for the purpose of operation, and attached it later to the Defendant’s 471C, which is owned by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant used the number plate of two-wheeled automobile unlawfully and simultaneously used the official sign for the purpose of exercising it.

2. Around 01:00 on September 14, 2016, the Defendant exercised the air defense that was unlawfully used by running a two-wheeled vehicle number plate, which was attached to the two-wheeled vehicle number plate, as described in the above paragraph 1, on the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Highway near Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act: (a) operated the Defendant’s ownership, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph (2).

4. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) Defendant 2 did not obtain a Class 2 small license to drive a two-wheeled vehicle at the end of the day specified in the above paragraph 2, and Defendant 1 driven the two-wheeled vehicle at approximately 9 km, a two-wheeled vehicle, from the Do in the vicinity of the tunnel No. 1, Namnam-dong, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, to the roads near the Seocho IC as stated in the above paragraph 2.

5. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Traffic Act”) on the one hand, along about 6 km from the IC to the IC on the one hand, on the one hand, the area where the passage of a two-wheeled vehicle is prohibited at the time specified in the said paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the origin of an offense;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Each comparison with the enemy;

1. Application of CBP50Ra Corba photographic and number plate-making photographic Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the Automobile Management Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow