A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant, who violated the Automobile Management Act and illegally uses air defense, removed the number plate of a two-wheeled automobile owned by the Defendant for the purpose of exercising it in the “C hotel” outdoor parking lot located in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Incheon, with the aim of exercising it in the “C hotel” outdoor parking lot, and is mixed with the Defendant’s ownership.

CB 40 The above number plate was attached to the back of the two-wheeled automobile in a way of fixing seals and voltss with Spanish widths.

Accordingly, the Defendant used the number plate of two-wheeled automobile unlawfully and simultaneously used the official sign for the purpose of exercising it.

2. From the place of paragraph (1) around March 18, 2016 at around 23:30 on March 18, 2016 to around 00:15 on March 19, 2016, the Defendant who illegally uses approximately 218 meters from the section of about 20km to the road in front of the mouth tunnel, and combines the number plate with paragraph (1).

CB 400 exercised the air defense that was illegally used by operating two-wheeled automobiles.

3. Where the owner of a two-wheeled motor vehicle in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act intends to have tubes, he/she shall obtain approval from the head of the relevant Si/Gun/Gu, and shall not operate a motor vehicle knowing that it has been tubesd in violation

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 23:30 on March 18, 2016, at the place of paragraph (1) around 23:30 on March 19, 2016 and around 00:15 on March 19, 2016, as the model of Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, 218, is mixed with a noise device installed at approximately 20km from around 20km to the front road of the

CB 400, a two-wheeled two-wheeled automobile, knowing that it was a two-wheeled two-wheeled two-wheeled automobile without approval.

Accordingly, the defendant was aware that he was a two-wheeled two-wheeled two-wheeled automobile without approval.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of internal investigation reports and field photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the relevant Act on the Management of Motor Vehicles, Article 71 (1) of the said Act, Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 81 subparagraph 20, Article 52, and Article 34 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Punishment;