Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On July 14, 2016, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year of probation to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and the above judgment was finalized on July 22, 2016. On April 27, 2017, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and six months of suspension of execution to one year and six months of imprisonment. The above judgment was finalized on May 5, 2017.

Defendant A, in collusion with Defendant B (one person referred to as “G”) on October 17, 2014, intended to sell a ticket to the victim H ( South, 68 years of age) in the Gungnam-gu, Gwangju-gu, about October 17, 2014, in collusion with Defendant B (one person referred to as “G”) to sell the ticket, and then resell the difference with the proceeds.

If investment is made, 50% of the principal shall be paid with the principal after one week.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant A received the investment from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and the profits.

Nevertheless, Defendant A, in collusion with Defendant B, received KRW 5 million from the victim under the name of Defendant A to the account (I) of Han Bank under the name of Defendant A for the purpose of making an investment, as well as received KRW 5 million from the victim. From December 8, 2014, Defendant A received KRW 185 million in total under the name of investment, etc. six times in the same manner as indicated in the attached crime list, as shown above.

Defendant B, in collusion with Defendant B on October 17, 2014, made an investment in a business to assist the victim H ( South and 68 years old) through the said A in a brea-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong in order to purchase airline tickets and resell them to a good person who has lived in good faith with the difference cumulative amount, Defendant B would be 50% of the principal and interest after one week.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant B did not have the intention or ability to pay the principal and the profit even though he received the investment from the victim.

Nevertheless, Defendant B, in collusion with Defendant A, belongs to the victim as above.