Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The Defendants shall acquire money of KRW 40 million from each applicant G to each applicant G.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A is the representative director of (State) O located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, 2004, and Defendant B, as an agent of Defendant A, was in charge of the overall affairs of the company, including the conclusion of a contract of carriage, funding, and management of loan borrowers, while serving as the representative director of (State)O as an agent of Defendant A.

Defendant

B around May 2014, around 2014, the victim F will sell the Prara air conditioning to the victim F.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the Defendants planned to provide the said Liber Vehicle to the obligee (State) Q as a substitute payment in order to repay the obligations of the said Liber Vehicle (State), and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the price to the victim by selling the said Liber Vehicle.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim, and acquired the vehicle from the victim to the victim at the time of May 26, 2014 at the market price of KRW 15 million.

Defendant A, “The 2015 Highest 2771,” was the representative director of the O, and Defendant B, as the agent of Defendant A, of the company in Seo-gu, Daejeon.

The victims, as Defendant A’s old workplace damages, were introduced from the Defendants on the O’s cargo transport services through R.

1. On August 1, 2012, the Defendants against the victim S shall purchase and operate the freight vehicle from the O to pay the proceeds of the Party at 2% of the monthly investment amount to the victim S at the above O office. There is no need to understand whether the principal of the investment will be guaranteed with the vehicle and the number plate.

“.” The purport was “.

However, the Defendants planned to use the investment funds of the victimized party as the O employee's benefits and operating funds, and even if they received an investment from the victimized party, they did not have the intent or ability to pay the principal and the profits by purchasing the cargo as above.

The Defendants conspired to induce the victim, thereby deceiving the victim, 4.5% of the same day from the victim.