logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.09.23 2016나2024862
신도회결의 무효확인청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport 1.1.

Reasons

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as that of the second to 11 last day of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or replacement as follows. Thus, this court's explanation of this case shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The defendant does not submit a statement of grounds for appeal in the trial and does not express specific guidance for appeal). The "Appearance" shall be added in front of the "a majority of majority" in Part 19 of the decision of the first instance.

The "expenses" in the 18th sentence of the fifth letter box of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to the "expenses" of the fifth letter box.

The term "C new map registration date" in the sixth table of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be construed as " January 15, 2015"; " January 15, 2015" as " January 15, 2005"; " December 12, 2014" as " December 22, 2014"; and " January 15, 2015" as " January 15, 2005" as " January 15, 2005" as " January 15, 2005."

Each "Witness" in the 17th sentence of the court of first instance shall be applied to the witness of the court of first instance.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for confirmation of invalidity of the resolution of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow