logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2016.09.23 2016고정145
협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 High 145"

1. In around 00:48 September 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) heard the horses that the Defendant reported the instant assault case to the police of the Victim F(333) from “D Singing practice place” located in C; (b) made a phone call to the victim using the Defendant’s mobile phone for female-friendly Gingers, and reported the victim’s “Sing Mafe, Mafe, without good cause,” and (c) filed a report;

2) Does the bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch mack, walp walp mar, walp walp walp walp, packer walp, packer walp walp;

Doese doese doese doese

C. The victim threatened the victim, such as chip gue, dead brue, vegetable, vegetable, vegetable, vegetable, and fish.

On August 2, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act of 146, 2016, the JA car was driven under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.063% in a section of about 100 meters from 100 meters to 100 meters from the Agricultural Road located in the YAampo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

3. On August 2, 2015, at around 07:10, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, the Defendant committed an assault before the 112-report from the Defendant that he was assaulted by the Defendant, and was dispatched to the site after receiving a report from 112 of the former Women-Friendly G G G G for the Bapo Police Station, which was called by the Defendant, thereby preventing the Defendant from continuously approaching the said G, and thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 High Court Decision 145]

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Recording CDs (2016 high class 146);

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Each police statement protocol concerning slope L or G;

1. Each written statement of M;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the circumstantial statement of a driver driving and notify the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation) and Article 148-2(2)3 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime.

arrow