The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment).

2. The lower court rendered the above sentence by taking account of the following favorable circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s price of the head of the victim’s head at the end of the brubb of the city where the Defendant was dead, in light of the risk of the crime; (b) the degree of the victim’s injury; and (c) the degree of the victim’s injury; (d) the Defendant recognized the crime; (c) the victim appears to have caused the occurrence of the crime; (d) the victim was the Defendant’s wife by mutual agreement with the victim; and (e) the victim was the victim’s wife; and (e) the Defendant did not have any

In full view of all the sentencing conditions, other than the circumstances considered by the court below, including the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, health, circumstances leading to a crime, means and result of the crime, size of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, which can be known through records and pleadings, the sentence of the court below appears to be appropriate, and the sentencing judgment of the court below exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion.

There is no circumstance that the assessment or maintenance thereof is deemed unfair (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Therefore, it is difficult to deem that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unfair because it is too unreasonable as the Defendant alleged.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.