The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court sentenced the above punishment by taking into account the following favorable circumstances: (a) the number of the crimes in this case is not considerable; (b) the victims want to be punished by the Defendant; (c) the Defendant was subject to a suspended sentence due to the same criminal record; and (d) the Defendant’s reflection of the gender; and (e) the fact that some damage was recovered.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, health, circumstances leading to a crime, means and consequence, scale of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, which can be known through records and pleadings, the lower court appears to have been properly sentenced and the lower court’s sentencing judgment exceeded the reasonable bounds of discretion.

There is no circumstance that the assessment or maintenance thereof is deemed unfair (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). Therefore, it is difficult to deem that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unfair because it is too unreasonable as the Defendant alleged.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.