1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 20, 2006, the Plaintiff entered a corporation B (hereinafter “B”) and was on duty as a vice head of an editing bureau and a vice head of an economic reporter. On January 29, 2014, the Plaintiff returned to the hospital as of January 29, 2014, and was sent back to the hospital, but no particular error was found, and returned to the hospital. On January 30, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “emergency brain fluor” (hereinafter “the instant injury disease”). On January 30, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a result of the examination conducted by visiting the hospital at around 11:00.

B. On May 29, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant, but the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of the application for medical care benefits on July 30, 2014 on the ground that it is difficult to acknowledge a proximate causal relation with the instant branch’s work. Thereafter, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant again on November 20, 2014, but the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of the application for medical care benefits on November 24, 2014 against the Plaintiff on the same ground as the previous.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff worked as the head of the editing station and the vice head of the economic department, while working as the head of the editing station and the head of the Internet portal in B, around May 2013, the number of reporters belonging to the editing station, who had seven persons, was reduced to five, and the collection and preparation of news articles was considerably increased. Around that time, as the Plaintiff performed the management of the Internet portal newspapers published by B, the Plaintiff was in charge of the site management by going to work not later than 1:8:0 a.m. and the Plaintiff was in charge of such excessive duties as working as the head of the National Press Trade Union C et al. as the head of the National Press Union C.

In addition, from November 2013, the Plaintiff issued D-related coverage, and worked not later than 11 p.m. on the day before the instant injury and disease occurred, which was the final date for coverage.