logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.08.13 2019고정126
주거침입
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant married with the victim B on April 6, 2007, and was living together with the victim on May 11, 2018, and was living separately from the victim C, C, D, and is under divorce litigation.

The defendant, once again, contacted the victim that he want to live in the above apartment house D, but the victim refused to do so and decided to open a door at will.

At around 14:30 on August 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened a door and opened a house in a situation where the entrance was not corrected because the victim operated the forced locking device within the house, but the door was not completely closed; (b) opened the door; and (c) put the defective body into the house to close the door by blocking the victim from doing so.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim's residence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant is living separately with the victim, and that the defendant has left the goods of his/her children who raise and caused the crime of this case, and some of the circumstances may be taken into account; the defendant has no record of punishment other than once a fine; the defendant has no record of punishment; the defendant's age, occupation, character and conduct

arrow