beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant operated “C”, which is a human resources supplier, from January 2015 to July 2015, between Gu and Si, from January 2015 to July 2015.
No one shall be issued or received an invoice for tax under tax-related Acts without supplying or receiving any goods or service.
Nevertheless, on February 28, 2015, the Defendant issued 14 copies of the false tax invoice of KRW 546,727,397, in total 14 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form, including the fact that the Defendant had not supplied human resources equivalent to KRW 132,111,232 to E in the operation of D around February 28, 2015, although there was no fact that the Defendant supplied human resources equivalent to the above amount of KRW 132,11,232 to D.
"2016 Highest 1679"
1. On July 10, 2008, the Defendant: (a) around 10, 2008, at the mutual influence point in the Gecheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the Defendant was operating the company as the director of I, the head of the I, who is a supply company of H human resources located in Kimcheon-si, the representative director of the company; (b) on the condition that the Defendant made an investment of KRW 10 million, the representative director of the company will be changed to the damaged person; and (c) 10% of the profit at the end of each month as a profit and at the end of each year.
The company delays the payment of wages from the 4 to 5 companies that entered into a service contract. First of all, if the employees pay wages on behalf of the employees, the company makes a false statement to the old branch office of the Labor Welfare Corporation and the service contract company. The company makes a false statement to the effect that money will be deposited from the old branch office of the Labor Welfare Corporation, and the victim presents the statement to the effect that "the notification of the result of the contract management" in the name of the old branch office of the Labor Welfare Corporation, and the document to the effect that "the business process for the purchase of working clothes and safety goods" in the name of the J representative director.
However, the above documents are forged by the defendant and are the old branch of the Labor Welfare Corporation.