logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2012.04.05 2011고단1660
업무상배임 등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B's imprisonment for 8 months, and Defendant C's fine for 300,000,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A From November 1, 2001, G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”) located in the F in the Yangju City as a regular director in charge of design from around May 15, 2009, and thereafter retired from May 18, 2009; and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing business around April 6, 2009, with the aim of a boiler, etc. established in the boiler industry around May 18, 2009.

Defendant

B, on March 3, 2009, he had been aware of working at the victim company, and proposed that Defendant A be responsible for the design work of boiler manufacturing based on the boiler manufacturing-related technology, etc., and Defendant A accepted the above proposal on April 3, 2009 and participated as Defendant Company’s promoters around April 6, 2009.

The Defendants completed the preparation for the establishment of the Defendant Company before leaving the Defendant Company, leaked the boiler design drawings, etc. of the victimized Company, and had the boiler produced and sold the boiler using them.

1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. From November 1, 2001, the Defendant, in occupational breach of trust, was in charge of preparing design drawings necessary for the manufacture of boiler (hereinafter “CAVITY method”) by developing a new plate made of ethyl and a core technology (hereinafter “CAVY method”) to solve problems arising from the separation distance between incineration and water pipes as a result of repeated increase and decrease in the boiler heat in the boiler operating process while working as a regular manager at the damaged company. Since the Defendant was in charge of preparing design drawings necessary for the manufacture of boiler around May 15, 2009, the Defendant was in charge of preparing trade secrets acquired while serving in the victimized company.

arrow