The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, although the defendant, who is a singingman, had the defendant to sell alcoholic beverages to E who is a customer, or arranged to provide a female customer with an opportunity to do so, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant was found to have arranged to sell alcoholic beverages to E or to have a female guide, and thus, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no illegality of misconception of the facts alleged by the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

① At the court of the court below, E settled KRW 80,00 after having ordered the Defendant to do so at the instant singing practice hall operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant singing practice hall”) around 01:22 on the day of the instant case.

Doese women entered into the room and each other, and they sent to F by affixing their pictures of Doese and beer while having been engaged in beer and beer.

In the event of singing in the room, the defendant's report is the same as the defendant has filed a report.

30,000 won was returned.

A specific statement was made to the effect that “I am walking along the single and walking along the single, I am walking along the sidewalk and marked a photograph of the sidewalk,” and the police also consistently made a statement to the same effect.

② At around 01:53 on the day of the instant case, E sent F the message “I will see” along with a photograph of 2 cans of beer and a photograph, etc., which a woman sings, and a photograph, etc., sing out to be singled on the Kakao Stockholm, and F will see the above photograph and message.