1. The Defendant’s KRW 35,00,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from April 6, 2015 to May 27, 2020.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The Defendant, at around April 5, 2015, carried out a new construction work of ready-mixed D located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do. (2) The Plaintiff was employed and work in an adjoining hole at the construction site and around April 5, 2015. On April 6, 2015, the Plaintiff, who was on the second floor of the aggregate open-to-land building in the aggregate open-to-land, was faced with an accident of falling down to the lower ground below 5 meters, which is double vad by vadi.

(C) In the instant case, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as the pressure frame, the right-side fladul, the ground fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation, the left-hand fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation, the left-hand fladation fladation fladation fladation fladation, the left-hand fladation fladation fladation fladation

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's evidence 1 through 3, the result of the physical appraisal entrusted to the head of this court, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant, an employer, should maintain the human and physical environment to work in a safe environment to the maximum extent possible in ordering the plaintiff, who is an employee, to work in a complaint, and the plaintiff can be found to have suffered the accident of this case due to the failure of the plaintiff to perform such duty of care so that the worker may not work dangerously without safety measures, although the safety manager conducts safety education.

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate for damages sustained by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case.

In this regard, the defendant only entrusted the construction of the new construction of the ready-mixed Factory located in Gyeongjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the defendant did not directly perform the construction work, and therefore the plaintiff is not obligated to do so.