logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.11.09 2015고단1306
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A received a request from the victim C to inquire about the person to purchase the victim E and 37 parcels in Gyeonggi-do Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, the victim C, and introduced the defendant B to the victim C. On December 19, 2013, the Defendants found the company to purchase the land to the victim C.

In order to purchase land with a loan from the company, the company may purchase the land subject to appraisal of at least ten billion won.

To receive an appraisal of at least 10 billion won, the victim C sent KRW 25 million to an account in the name of F which is a bromoer for loan appraisal by stating that it is necessary for KRW 100 million at the cost of appraisal and bank consulting costs.” However, F was aware that it has no ability to obtain a written appraisal meeting the loan terms, the victim C was able to obtain money by receiving KRW 75 million, which would be additionally received from victims.

The Defendants, on January 18, 2014, at a mutually influorous restaurant with the trade name at a time less than once in the Gui-si, Mai-si, and the victim C, “The appraisal has been completed.”

In order to find an appraisal report, KRW 75 million is required.

“.....”

However, there was no appraisal report on the above Kimpo-si land, and most of the money received from the victims were thought to be used for an individual purpose, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to issue an appraisal report even if he received money from the victims for the purpose of appraisal expenses because there was no work related to the issuance of an appraisal report to obtain a loan.

In collusion, the Defendants received 75 million won from the victim C to the G name account on January 22, 2014 and acquired it by deceiving the victim C as such.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the second public trial protocol

1. Statement made by C by the witness in the third public trial protocol;

1. Prosecutions for H.

arrow