Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant and C are not authorized to handle narcotics.

1. At around 19:00 on July 15, 2013, the Defendant and C conspired with D to administer psychotropic drugs purchased by D from non-real names in the “F” house of the People’s Republic of China “F”, “F”, the Defendant and C, in collusion with D, pursuant to the following: (a) to administer psychotropic drugs; (b) to make one half of the cirs as soon as possible; and (c) to put one of the two cirs in water at the entrance of the Republic of China; and (d) to put the ciropon into the entrance of the water without locking the water; and (e) to cut off the ciropon with a ciropon by fasting the water through a water speed of the remainder; and (e) to administer the ciropon by spreading the ciropon (i.e., a g., a droponononon).

2. At around 20:00 on July 22, 2013, Defendant A administered approximately 0.5g of philopon received from D in collusion with D in the manner described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of D or C;

1. Results of a request for appraisal, a written confirmation of the results of a simple test of reagents, and photographs of the results of a simple test of reagents;

1. Status of entry or departure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc., and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, the choice of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the order of provisional payment has been administered twice by the defendant, and the nature of the crime is not weak;

However, it takes into account the fact that the defendant has no criminal record at all, in favor of the defendant.