logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.18 2014가합6794
정직취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit dismissed the part of the claim for nullification of the disposition of two months of education.

2. The Defendant’s act on January 2, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a broadcasting reporter who is in office of the defendant.

The individual evaluation of employees of the defendant's 10% higher than 5% higher than 15% higher than 80% higher than 15% higher than 70% higher than 10% higher than 30% higher than 30% higher than 60% higher than 10% higher than 10% higher than 10% higher than 30% higher than 10% higher is based on the achievement evaluation and capabilities evaluation. In principle, the achievement evaluation shall be conducted twice a year

The criteria for granting the defendant's individual evaluation rating are as follows:

As such, E(S), T(T), and C(O) grades are assigned according to the relative order of the results of individual evaluations, but the lower grade is the absolute evaluation, and the lower grade is given when the sum of points is less than 70 points.

In the evaluation of achievements in the first half of 2012, the defendant shall conduct the same year from January 30, 2012

7. On the ground that the Plaintiff participated in the strike up to 17.17, the lower class was given to the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “First Evaluation of Achievements”) In addition, in the first evaluation of achievements in 2013, the Defendant granted the Plaintiff the R class, the lowest class, to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff failed to follow the Defendant’s occupational instructions and obstructed the unity of the department within the department with respect to the decision on the disapproval of the “B” program (hereinafter “instant program”).

(hereinafter referred to as “the second evaluation”) and, in the second half of 2013, the Defendant granted the Plaintiff the lowest class on the ground that the Plaintiff was engaged in passive work in the news gathering division of the sports bureau.

hereinafter referred to as "third evaluation of achievements".

(1) The evaluation items of the evaluation department of the evaluation of the contents of the classification of the list Nos. 1 and the evaluation of self-technology of the evaluation department of the evaluation of the achievements of the first half of 2012 (30 points) 18 points in the evaluation of the evaluation report of the achievements of the evaluation report of the achievements of the first half of 2012 (50 points) and 12 points in total (20 points) 60 points in total and 12 points in the evaluation of the achievements of the evaluation report of the second half of 2013, respectively (30 points) 42 points in the evaluation of the achievements of the evaluation report of the achievements of the second half of 2013 (50 points).

arrow