logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.08.10 2016고단2933
품질경영및공산품안전관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A In four months of imprisonment, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is F of the increase in the number of S S S S S B and C, and Defendant B and C are non-standing examiners of the increase in the number of sustainable companies, who have performed the duties of quality management system certification and environmental management system certification review.

1. Joint crimes committed by Defendant A and C;

A. The Defendants were aware of the certification of environmental management system by fraud or other wrongful means, despite that the fact is not a company suitable for obtaining the certification of environmental management system, the Defendants were willing to prepare a false report as if they were suitable for obtaining the certification of environmental management system and submit a false report to the certification body to allow the certification body to certify the environmental management system. While Defendant C did not actually conduct the examination to Defendant A, Defendant C would allow the certification body to use its name in the examination report as if it had conducted the examination, and Defendant A was willing to prepare and submit a false report in the name of Defendant C.

Defendant

A around March 13, 2015, around 13, 2015, after visiting and examining the business entity on behalf of the Defendant C, a system meeting the certification standards, such as the internal examination system, etc., was not established in lieu of the Defendant C who is assigned to the examiner, and submitted a false report on examination to the certification body, and submitted it to the certification body, and had the certification body certify E and this Korea certify the environmental management system.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to certify the environmental management system in a false or unjust manner.

B. The Defendants’ fact is that the quality management system certification is certified in a false or unjust manner, even though it is not an enterprise suitable for a company gambling to obtain a quality management system certification.

arrow