A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2016, the Defendant argued that the taxi drivers E and taxi charges were over-paid on the front of the D District District located in Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol on the front of the D District; and (b) the police officer F, who belongs to the Dong-gu Police Station D District, Jung-gu, Seoul, recommended the Defendant to pay the D and taxi charges and to return home; (c) the Defendant cannot pay the charges unfairly; and (d) whether the “W,” if the police officer is a police officer, should not resolve the civil petition.

The Defendant and F made an assault by plucking, plucking, plucking, and plucking the above F’s left hand with sound, and then booming the F’s f’s f’s breath with a bundled hand, and then being pushed back to the floor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials in front of the earth.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to witness F and E’s legal statement [Recognition of credibility by taking into account the attitude towards making a statement, social status, relationship with the defendant, interests and necessity arising from false statements];

1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts and the reasons for the sentencing of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment) [Determination of the type] The basic area of interference with the performance of official duties of the military that interferes with the performance of official duties [decision of the recommended area] [the scope of punishment] six months to one year and six months [decision of sentence]], according to the victim and witness's clear statement, the defendant is under the influence of alcohol, and even if he sufficiently recognizes the fact that he exercised violence against the police officer working on the earth and interfered with his duties, the defendant is consistently and consistently under the influence of the police officer, and instead takes charge of the defendant's statement and responsibility, even if he sufficiently recognizes the fact that he exercised violence against the police officer working on the earth and interfered with his duties, the crime of the crime of this case is not easy, and the circumstances after the crime are poor, and the defendant is not guilty.