logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.30 2016고정558
일반교통방해
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. On September 22, 2015, 58 organizations, such as the Federation of the Korean Democratic Workers’ Unions (hereinafter “the Federation”), the Federation of the Korean Farmers’ Association, the Korean Anti-National Association, and the Gyeonggi-do Sports Association, decided to integrate each assembly on the basis of various major government issues, such as labor reform, history textbooks, and the decline in the rice value, and announced “the headquarters of the war against the general public,” the launch of “the headquarters of the war against the general public, i.e., the Republic of Korea,” which read “the head office of the war against the general public, i.e., the Republic of Korea, as Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga ? Ga Ga Ga Ga, Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga,” and declared to hold a substitute for the general public, which aims at the participation of 100,000 people on November 14, 2015.

Defendant

A, a democratic Nowon-gu Construction Industry E and Defendant B, a member of the Democratic Nowon-gu Construction Industry Federation on November 14, 2015, attended an assembly of the Democratic Nowon-gu Construction Industry Federation in front of the building in Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul on November 14, 2015, at around 26, at around 14:25, 14:25, a democratic Nowon-gu, who moved ahead of the 136, as Seoul Jung-gu, to the front of the 136, as Seoul Jung-gu, while moving ahead of the 15:40, a member of the National Assembly organized by a democratic Nowon-gu, by arresting the road outside the aforesaid Seoul plaza, and, at around 16:45, a member of the National Assembly was in front of the 15:5-hour Cheongjin-gu, a member of the National Assembly was in front of the 14th parallel and a 1:5th parallel with the 10th parallel in the direction of another participant’s name.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the participants in the above assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

2. Determination

A. In light of Article 6(1) of the Assembly and Demonstration Act and its legislative intent, in a case where a legitimate report is completed under the Assembly and Demonstration Act and an assembly or demonstration is conducted on the road.

arrow