1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. As to the instant case, the reasoning of this court is as follows: “The court of first instance” of the first instance, “this court” of the first instance judgment 3, 8; “The court of first instance 5, 10, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10, 5, 10, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10, 5, 5, 10, 5, 5, 5, 10, 5, 10, 5, 5, 100, 5, 5, 5, 100, 5, 100, 5, 7, 100, 5, 10, 100, 10, 200, 10, 200, 10, 30,000, 3,00.”

2. In light of the following: “(i) The part used for the correction of the body of this case remains scarcitys horizontally below both sides of the Plaintiff; (ii) the method of replacing the location of the body of the two-wheeled body by securing the liquidity of the two-wheeled body after the regional intake as claimed by the Defendants, which is the operation method claimed by the Defendants, is difficult to use the body of this case for the correction of the body of this case, because it is difficult to use the body of this case as an operation for the correction of the body of this case; (iii) the body of this case does not indicate the operation method in the operation record; (iv) the body of this case is not the method claimed by the Defendants, but rather the body of this case is infinites after cutting the skin and the local organization of the part below which is part of the body of this case; and (iv) the body of this case is added to the body of this case by inserting the body of two-wheeled body of this case; and (v) the body