Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of one year, Defendant C’s imprisonment of six months, and Defendant D’s fine of 2,00.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 1546]
1. Defendant A, B, and C’s co-principal offenders and I (Inn, J) induced an unspecified male to the telephoneping, thereby engaging in sexual traffic, and the Defendants waiting in the Mophone area when I communicate with each other, conspired to take money and valuables by threatening the male number of sexual buyers.
On February 25, 2014, at around 02:00, the I promised to hold smartphones with the victim D (ma, 32 years of age) and receive 100,000 won and to engage in sexual intercourse, and then the victim was only the victim was in front of the Non-City/Do free market located in Bupyeong-si.
At around 03:10 on February 25, 2014, I entered with the victim on 203:10, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si K LMobel 203, and sent the phrase “A” to Defendant A with a cell phone prior to the toilet, and let the Defendants enter the above 203 room. The Defendants came to the room in which I had sexual intercourse with the victim, and Defendant A was friendly with I, and Defendant B was delivered with Defendant B, “A is an associate organized violence. If a minor is a minor, a fine of KRW 10 million is imposed at the police station.” Defendant C expressed the attitude that Defendant C had expressed a view that it would endanger the victim by waiting around the victim and doing harm to the victim.” Defendant C was delivered KRW 200,000 in cash from the victim.
As a result, the Defendants jointly carried out 2 million won from the victim in conjunction with I.
2. Defendant B’s crime
A. On February 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:40 on February 26, 2014, was investigated as a suspect by committing a crime with the same content as described in the above paragraph (1) within the Seoul Jongno-gu Police Station and a strong three team office located in Jongno-gu Seoul Police Station; (b) the name and resident number of M known prior to the investigation was revealed; and (c) was conducted as if he was M.
The defendant shall, after completion of his investigation, exercise his authority.