logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.07.11 2017나4661
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment by the court concerning the cause of the claim is that the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the corresponding part of the judgment, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment as to it

A. The summary of the defendant's assertion ① Since the defendant was actually paid the sum of KRW 57,00,000 ( KRW 15,000,000) of each of the above agreements by the plaintiff, each of the above payments shall be null and void. The above payment forms are also made by the plaintiff's intimidation and coercion. ② The above payment forms are made by the plaintiff's intimidation and coercion, and thus all of them shall be revoked.

B. First of all, the defendant's above argument that the defendant issued and delivered 40,40,000 won to the plaintiff on March 30, 201; 50 won on July 12, 201; 400,000 won on August 16, 201; 400,000 won on October 5, 201; 300,000 won on April 14, 200; 30,000 won on each of the above loan; 40,000 won on each of the above loan; 30,000 won on each of the above loan ; 40,000 won on each of the above loan ; 30,000 won on each of the above loan ; 40,000 won on each of the above loan ; 40,000 won on May 30, 205; 200,000 won on each of the above loan ;

arrow