A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On March 21, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud to the District Court on March 21, 2016, and the execution of the sentence was completed on October 7, 2016.

1. On October 23, 2016, the Defendant issued an order for alcoholic beverages, etc. as if he did not have an intent or ability to pay the price even if he did not have a credit card or cash at the time and received alcoholic beverages, etc. from an injured party because he did not have a credit card or cash.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, was provided with alcoholic beverages and services equivalent to KRW 480,000 in total, such as Scarblu 2 C, Scarblu 2 C, Sabo, and Sadomin Domin Domin.

2. On October 25, 2016, the Defendant ordered the “H” outline of the Victim G management “H” in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do. The Defendant ordered alcoholic beverages, etc. as if they were to pay for the amount even if he did not have any credit card or cash at the time, even if he did not have any intent or ability to pay the amount even if he did not receive alcoholic beverages, etc. from the injured party.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim as above, was provided with alcoholic beverages and services equivalent to KRW 330,000 in total, such as Scarblu 2 C, Scarblu 2 C, Sabo, and Sadomin Domin Domin.

3. On November 18, 2016, the Defendant ordered the “K” outline for the victim J’s operation in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do. Around November 21, 2016, the Defendant ordered alcoholic beverages, etc. as if they were to pay for the amount even if they did not have credit cards or cash at the time and were provided with alcoholic beverages, etc. from the injured party due to a lack of intent or ability to pay the amount.

The defendant deceiving the victim as above and was provided with alcoholic beverages and services equivalent to KRW 640,00,00 in total, including the amount of 2-C, 40,000,000 from the injured party's service charges.

In this regard, the defendant had been informed of victims three times habitually and received property and acquired property benefits.