A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 31, 2017, from around 03:15 to 03:25 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the Defendant would be able to see the following: (b) the Defendant: (c) the Victim C’s “A” operated in Jeju-si from around 03:15 to around 03:25 of the same day; and (d) the Defendant, on the ground that D, who was an employee of the said main shop, was fluored, was fluored, and said D was fluored by fluoring the beer’s disease; and (d) the beer’s disease was fluored by putting it into the table and fluoring it on his/her hand; and (e) fluoring fluor, fluor, etc. to the customers who are fluord next to the table.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

On August 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 03:46, at the “F” restaurant parking lot located in E at Jeju on August 5, 2018, the Defendant attached the said car to ensure that the victim G, while drinking alcohol with himself, first of all, the victim G, who was drinking with the victim, is placed in front of and rear the right side of the H-learning car owned by the victim, by drinking and launching a house in front of the right side of the said car, even if even door, front glass, etc. in front and rear of the said car, and a gold is set off in front of the said car, so that the fee for repair can be set off.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

around 03:40 on September 2, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 03:40 on the street run by the Victim J in Jeju-si; and (b) on the street with two male employees of the said main shop, K, an employee of the said main shop, caused the said male’s convenience by breaking the entrance door and the door door windows of the entrance of the said main shop and the door door glass of the said main shop; (c) on the hand, the said main office’s table was shick up, thereby cutting off the glass cup in which the table was put on the table; and (d) the glass cup in which the table was put on the table of the said main office was shicked by breaking the two separate tables of the said main office into two hand so that it could not be easily known that it could be damaged by means of exchanging it, such as free exchange.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 351"

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.