logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단4679
대부업등의등록및금융이용자보호에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) Any person who violates the Act on the Registration of Loan Business, etc. and the Protection of Financial Users shall register his/her loan business or loan brokerage business with the administrative agency having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business and shall not collect interest exceeding the interest rate prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, even though the Defendant engaged in illegal loan business using a counseling fluencing fries in the United States made by false means in Seoul Songpa-gu Seoul E building 303, and was punished on March 29, 2016, the Defendant was able to newly employ female students F and to resume loan business by purchasing and paying goods using mobile phone settlement information of the applicant for small-amount loans at the Internet shopping mall site, and then cancelling the purchase and payment of goods, and then receiving refund from the shopping mall site.

Accordingly, the defendant, the defendant,

4. 1. On the Internet bulletin board, a notice was posted on the advertisement stating the phrase “the cash of carry-on small amount” on the Internet bulletin board, and the advertisement reported the advertisement and proposed that G be sent cash, except for the commission fee, using a mobile phone, to allow it to pay the small amount of KRW 49,200, and then, 349,440 remaining after deducting KRW 149,760, which is 30% as prior interest, from the deduction of KRW 149,760 which is 30% as prior interest, was remitted to his account. From around that time to September of the same year, from October of the same year to April 4, 2017, from 303, from 3010 to 3010, from 301, 301, 306, 18, 208, 16, 208, 208, 208, 167, 208.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the interest rate limitation in collusion with F (the suspension of indictment on the same day) and did not register with the competent authorities.

arrow