logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.06 2013고단2666
사기
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months for the crimes No. 1, No. 3, and No. 6 of the holding of the defendant.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant on June 30, 2010 sentenced on June 30, 201 to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of forgery of official seal by the Incheon District Court and two years of suspension

7.8 The judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On March 6, 2009, the Defendant stated that “Agreging is a major father, such as having a gas station, having a commercial building in Ulsan, etc., and if the mother makes an investment in the exchange rate in Japan to make a large amount of hot spring business in Japan, the profits from the market price will accrue, and if the mother lends money, 10% interest will be paid.” However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent to make an investment in the exchange rate, and did not have any ability to repay the borrowed money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 10 million from the victim to the account of community credit cooperatives under the name of the Defendant, and received a total of KRW 284 million over 14 times from around that time to February 23, 2011, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On June 5, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim F at the D Co., Ltd. D Co., Ltd. D Co., Ltd. located in Ssung City, stating, “I would make a large amount of interest through exchange rate investment if I lend money.” However, even if I borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent to make an exchange rate investment, and did not have the ability to repay the borrowed money.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the victim the check the amount of KRW 17 million from the seat, namely, the check.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

3. On August 18, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H stating that “I would make an investment in exchange rates, and would make a 10% profit if I lend money.” However, even if I borrowed money from the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent to make an investment in exchange rates, and did not have any ability to repay the borrowed money.

Nevertheless, the defendant is guilty.

arrow