1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the modification of the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including “related Acts and subordinate statutes,” but excluding the part pertaining to “3. conclusion”). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2)

2. The amended portion of 3 pages “(including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)” shall be changed to “(including each number, and, unless otherwise specified, hereinafter the same shall apply)”.

4 Under the 4th page, the term “6. 21 of the same month” shall be read as “16. 21 of the same month”.

6 The 6th page "(including paper numbers)" shall be deleted.

From the 6th parallel to the 9th parallel parallels, “On the other hand, on the other hand, on the other hand, on the basis of the fact that the court of first instance cited by this court,” “in light of the following circumstances, on the basis of the overall purport of the pleadings, the evidence Nos. 13, 14, and evidence No. 4 cited by this court:

The 6th 10th 6th am “Grounds for Disposition” means “The defendant Corporation received medical care benefit costs by claiming for medical care benefits from the defendant Corporation, even though the person was visited directly at the domicile of his relative, not a member of the instant case, at the same time, who was not a member of the instant medical care center, and received the medical care benefit costs,” which is the grounds for Disposition.

6 The 6th day below two parallels shall be as follows:

In light of the fact that the Plaintiff provided medical treatment to approximately 10 other students in Hanwon on each of the above dates, and that the patient’s treatment time takes place for long time due to the characteristics of the treatment method, it is easy to readily conclude that the Plaintiff provided visiting medical treatment by using the time, not only the time of medical treatment of Hanwon but also the time of 3 hours to the vehicle from Seoul for the convenience of relatives.