beta
Text
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of this judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
Reasons
1. The Defendants are the joint representatives of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Co., Ltd. in the third floor of the building in Yeongdeungpo-gu.
Defendant
A made a false statement to the victim E in a place not known at the end of March 2018, stating, “A shall make a settlement on the 15th day of the following month by making a monthly call to the victim E and lending a tour bus to make a tour of Busan, Daegu, etc. to make a settlement on the 15th day of the following month.”
However, it was difficult to attract foreign tourists at the time, and as a result, it was not easy to attract foreign tourists, and once attracting foreign tourists, it was thought that they would pay the victim's tourist bus payment by the prompt name, such as paying the expenses incurred in attracting foreign tourists to the money received by the next foreign tourists, etc., and the ender would not be able to pay the cost of attracting foreign tourists because of the lack of new foreign tourists, and even if they are lent a tourist bus from the victim due to the lack of any other property or income, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount.
In collusion, the Defendants: (a) conspired to induce the victim; (b) borrowed the F bus from the victim on April 4, 2018; and (c) failed to pay the amount of KRW 200,000,000; and (c) from then on, until June 27, 2018, the Defendants acquired the same amount of monetary benefits by failing to pay the loan amounting to KRW 25,542,90,00 in total on 22 occasions, as indicated in the separate crime list, as indicated in the separate crime list.
2. The following facts are acknowledged according to the instant records, such as the witness E’s legal statement, each tax invoice, value-added tax return, account transaction details, and account transaction details submitted by the Defendants.
① Defendant B has been engaged in the travel business for up to 20 years, and Defendant A has been engaged in the travel business for up to 10 years, and Defendant B has arranged to attract foreign tourists.