logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고단89
사기
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, as married couple, operated a travel company mainly for tourists in South Asia, such as Thailand, and instead of receiving less expenses than travel expenses from the travelr, the Defendants created profits by receiving 10-60% of the cost of goods purchased from the shopping center as the fee.

However, the defendants had no intention or ability to pay the cost of using tourist buses or the cost of meals, because the amount of shopping sold by tourists has decreased and the amount of travel expenses received from tourists has been accumulated.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendants committed the crime against the Victim F, Co., Ltd., Ltd., committed the crime, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the usage fees even after being provided a tourist bus, etc. from the victimized Company, in collusion, around March 2014, the Defendants made a false statement to H who operates the said Company at the damaged Company’s office located in G at the time of the strike, stating, “A travel agent, who operates the said Company, invited overseas tourists of East Asia. A travel bus with a driver and a Gad, will first be paid every month on a monthly basis.”

Although the Defendants were provided with tourist buses from the victimized Company from March 13, 2015 to March 17, 2015, the Defendants did not pay KRW 1,225,000 for the use thereof, and did not pay KRW 1,225,00, and did not pay KRW 19,375,000 for the total amount of KRW 25,625,00 from March 29, 2015, and did not pay KRW 25,625,00 from March 29, 2015.

2. The Defendants committed the crime against the victim I even though they were provided with tourist buses, etc. from the victimized company, as in the above premise, did not have the intent or ability to pay the amount of use.

arrow