A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five months for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court on September 1, 2009, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 20, 2009.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On January 8, 2008, the Defendant is called “the construction of a main complex apartment on the lots outside G and 17 lots owned by the F, Gyeonggi-do, and the construction of a main complex apartment on the surface of the victim E” and “the construction of a two thousand main complex apartment.”

B. The Gu administration is set aside, and the construction is to run from February 2008;

In order to take part in the civil engineering works, 10 million won is loaned.

In fact, the Defendant did not obtain permission to implement the project from the competent authorities at the time, and the said Corporation did not have to obtain funds through the PF of the financial right. However, since the PF loan was not finalized in the financial right, it was impossible to receive civil engineering works, etc. from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to pay the funds borrowed from the absence of any special revenue or property. The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, led the victim to transfer 100 million won to the F’s account on the same day from the victim to the F on the same day. On January 2, 2008, the Defendant would take out civil engineering works equivalent to 30 billion won from the LFF’s commercial facilities construction works.

"Finally false."

However, in fact, the Defendant was unable to proceed with the construction of a new apartment complex in 2005, and the construction of the above Suwon World Cup stadium was conducted from around 2005, and the construction of a new apartment complex in 2005 did not proceed from around 2005, so it was impossible for the Defendant to receive civil works, etc. even if he borrowed the above money from the victim.