1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 32,415,710 and the interest rate of KRW 12% per annum from June 17, 2010 to the day of complete payment.

In full view of the contents of evidence Nos. 1 through 10, the Plaintiff, who runs the business of manufacturing and processing and selling various kinds of paper papers, etc., continues to supply the above paper paper paper to the Defendant.

As the purchase price of KRW 68,869,122 as of December 28, 2009 was not paid, the lawsuit was filed with Suwon District Court Ansan Branch 2010Da4936, Jun. 25, 2010. The above court rendered a judgment on June 25, 2010 that “the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff 68,869,122 won and interest thereon at the rate of 20% per annum from June 17, 2010 to the day of full payment,” and the above judgment can be acknowledged the fact that became final and conclusive on July 16, 2010.

According to this, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff who filed a lawsuit again for the extension of the prescription amounting to 32,415,710 won and damages for delay calculated by the rate of 12% per annum for the plaintiff within the limit of 20% per annum from June 17, 2010 to the date of complete payment.

In regard to this, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff's claim of this case is groundless since the defendant did not have a contractual relationship with the plaintiff and purchased goods from the plaintiff. However, in the lawsuit of this case brought by the plaintiff for the extension of the prescription period of the claim for the price of goods which is confirmed by the previous final judgment, the defendant alleged that there was no fact that the contract was concluded by the defendant, and disputing the existence of the claim for the price of goods is in conflict with the res

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.