logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.01.24 2017고단1076
사기등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one month for each crime against the victim B and C, and the other victims in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court) and completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Northern District Court on March 8, 2015, and on August 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Jungbu District Court on August 22, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 14, 2016.

around August 2015, the Defendant called “E cosmetic” located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, that “I would have a cash later because I would have a cash.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the price for beauty art services due to the absence of certain occupation, import, or property.

As above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim B, received an amount equivalent to KRW 5,00,00 from the victim; (b) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount in a manner that did not pay the amount; and (c) by deceiving the victims in the same manner as above, and (d) obtained property or pecuniary benefits from the victims over ten times from the victims, as described in the crime sight table from around that time to December 2, 2016.

around 02:04 on January 30, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 2153,” saying, around 02:04, the Defendant: (a) was boarding the taxi in the taxi station in Seoul U.S. and sent to the Victim F, a taxi engineer, up to the new forest path.

At the same time, the injured person took the same attitude as paying taxi expenses to the new owner of the taxi by taking the defendant into consideration the new owner of the taxi.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay taxi charges even if he was provided with taxi transportation services from the injured party.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, had the victim drive a taxi from around 02:38 on the same day to the new forest station on the same day, and paid only 4,600 won out of 24,600 won, and remitted the taxi fee for the day to the account.

referring to the taxi that is landed.

arrow