logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.22 2015가단118425
청구이의 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The plaintiff asserts that a notary public fully repaid his/her obligation to Defendant B based on an executory notarial deed, No. 94 of 2007, 2007, which was drawn up by a law firm consignor, and that he/she was not subject to compulsory execution based on the original copy of the above

Therefore, there is no evidence to prove that the plaintiff has fully repaid his obligations to the deceased B.

[M] According to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, each of the plaintiff's evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, it is recognized that the plaintiff was convicted of the crime, etc. that the non-party D submitted the complaint of this case to the court and exercised the altered receipt as evidentiary material]. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow