All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendants did not commit assault or injure F or G as stated in the facts charged.

Nevertheless, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts charged and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentencing (Defendant A: a fine of KRW 2 million, Defendant B: a fine of KRW 1.5 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In light of the difference between the first instance court and the appellate court’s method of evaluating the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court in light of the contents of the first instance judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is clearly erroneous in light of the contents of the first instance judgment and the evidence duly examined by the first instance court, or the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is clearly deemed unreasonable in full view of the evidence examination results of the first instance court’s examination and the results of additional evidence examination conducted until the closing of arguments in the appellate court, the appellate court does not reverse the first instance judgment on the ground that the first instance court’s determination on the credibility of a statement made by a witness of the first instance court is different from the appellate court’s determination (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2011Do5313, Jun. 14, 2012).