The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged, despite the fact that the defendant suffered bodily injury due to the victim or G driving, and the defendant did not occupy the Oralbane operated by the victim, is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts and affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The Defendant asserted the same purport as the grounds for appeal even in the lower court, and the lower court rejected the above assertion by stating in detail the decision on this issue.

On the other hand, the court below testified to the effect that the circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, H, the defendant's wife testified that he met twice in the same direction as that of the victim's walking (the 8th page of the trial record), and that the defendant met with the defendant's right side in the police and the prosecutor's office on the ground that "I am walking along the road and go against the defendant's right side" (the 32th page of the evidence record and 95th page of the trial record) but the court of the court below stated to the effect that "I am on the defendant's right side of the defendant's walking, and I am on the part of the defendant's walking in the direction of the opposite direction and the opposite direction of the defendant's walking," and that the defendant is not in conflict with the victim's appearance at the trial record of this case (the 94th page of the trial record of this case).

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.