beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from January 24, 2019 to June 2, 2020, and thereafter.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. Fact 1) Child-care centers in Seopo-si C (hereinafter “child-care centers of this case”)
(2) On January 24, 2019, the Defendant, the president of parents, called the “instant act of defamation,” posted a letter containing the facts stated in the separate criminal facts on the instant room with the parents of students beginning in a reading room (hereinafter “instant act of defamation”).
(2) On March 23, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant as defamation, etc.
The Plaintiff received benefits from the date of dismissal until the date of reinstatement, and the Plaintiff received 6,000,000 won from the head of the above child-care center while retiring from the child-care center.
3) On September 20, 2019, the Defendant was found guilty of the crime in the annexed Form, and was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and to two years of suspended sentence, and the above judgment became final and conclusive. [Grounds for Recognition] The facts of no dispute, Gap 1, 3, and evidence Nos. 6, 7, and each of the statements (with serial numbers) in the evidence Nos. 1, 3, 6, and 6, and 7,
B. According to the above facts of determination, since the defendant's act of defamation of this case has damaged the plaintiff's reputation, the defendant is obligated to compensate for damages suffered by the plaintiff.
The following circumstances revealed from the above facts, i.e., the Defendant’s writing prepared and posted without properly verifying the facts, which affected the Plaintiff’s reputation, and caused the Plaintiff’s dismissal, and the Plaintiff’s withdrawal was explicitly demanded while posting the article. However, the Defendant appears to have performed the act of defamation with the intent of performing duties as the president of parents of child care centers of this case rather than for personal complaints or retaliation against the Plaintiff. The general public can confirm the contents of this case.