logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.07 2017나86996
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the case where the defendant additionally determines as to the assertion added by the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The defendant's assertion

A. 1) The summary of the argument that one-half or more of the parents using the child care center in this case were excluded from the voting in this case is that the father and the mother of the child care center D (hereinafter “child care center in this case”) are both the parents of the child, and it does not mean one of the parents or one grandparent or one of the grandparents. Thus, there is a serious defect that the voting rights of the “parent” of the child in this case were infringed upon due to voluntary voting (hereinafter “the voting in this case”) as to one-child parents or one-child parents or grandparents. 2) In light of the following circumstances, Gap evidence 5, Eul evidence 7 and 9 (including serial number, hereinafter the same shall apply) were stated in the agreement to vote in this case, and one-half of the two-one voting rights of the children in this case were exercised, and the Plaintiff continued to use the voting rights of the child care center in this case. 1. 1. 2. 1. 1. 2. 2. 1, the Plaintiff’s guardian’s voting in this case, among the Plaintiff’s guardian’s voting in this case.

arrow